The case of Edun v. Governor of Delta State highlighted legal controversies surrounding the principle of locus standi in Nigeria. The appellant, a concerned citizen, taxpayer, and legal practitioner, challenged the constitutionality of provisions in the Pension Rights of the Governor and Deputy Governor of Delta State Law, Cap. P5, Laws of Delta State, 2008.

The provisions allowed for substantial financial benefits to former governors and their deputies, which the appellant argued conflicted with the Nigerian Constitution and fiscal prudence

However, both the trial court and the Court of Appeal dismissed the case, ruling that the appellant lacked the requisite locus standi to sue. The decision sparked criticism for its restrictive interpretation, viewed as contrary to global trends toward liberalizing locus standi to enable public interest litigation

Global Comparisons:

  • India: Indian courts have extensively liberalized locus standi under Article 32 of the Constitution. Landmark cases like Bandhua Mukti Morcha v. Union of India demonstrate a proactive judicial stance in allowing public interest litigation
  • United Kingdom: The UK moved away from restrictive approaches in cases like R v. Inspectorate of Pollution, ex-parte Greenpeace.
  • South Africa: South Africa’s 1996 Constitution broadened the scope of locus standi, enabling broader public access to justice.

Recommendations for Reform in Nigeria:
The study calls for Nigeria to adopt a more liberal interpretation of locus standi, particularly in matters concerning public interest and financial accountability. It also recommends that the appellant should escalate the case to the Supreme Court, given recent precedents supporting broader access to justice.

Conclusion:
The Edun v. Governor of Delta State case serves as a critical reflection point for Nigeria’s judiciary. While other jurisdictions have embraced public interest litigation as a cornerstone of justice and accountability, Nigeria remains constrained by restrictive doctrines. Judicial reforms are urgently needed to align with global best practices and ensure citizens can hold public officials accountable without unnecessary legal barriers.