By Abubakar D. Sani, Esq.
Seldom has the expression Of solidarity through a shared platform By an otherwise disparate agglomeration Generated the sort of storm – Which attended the so-called Asaba Declaration Issued on Tuesday, the 11th of May, 2021 By the Governors of the 17-odd States of Southern Nigeria – less one Consisting of 12 different items, Its key demands: a ban on open grazing within the region; Reflection of federal character in federal appointments; Restructuring; and convoking a national dialogue – Have been criticized by mostly Northern elements – Notably, Dr. Ahmed Lawan, the Senate President And the Daily Trust Newspaper Others in the Region (such as Miyetti Allah) – Have merely rued the “the failure” of their own Governors To act on the relevant issues – proactively and decisively Thus surrendering the initiative To their colleagues in the South As to the substance of The seemingly controversial demands, It does seem that They’ve been caught up – By the usual Nigerian factor: Our tendency – nay, proclivity To politicise virtually everything Including those which are clearly innocuous Starting with open grazing: Its ban, by the Executive In any part of the country Is just that: a declaration of policy For its enforcement, it needs the Police Something which the Centre presently monopolizes This dove-tails into the wider call for restructuring – Which – along with tinkering with the revenue-sharing formula – And so-called true federalism – requires amending the Constitution A document, which – in its present form – Is the subject of much resentment Given the circumstances of its enactment The same applies to the alleged absence Of federal character in President Buhari’s appointments That provision of the Constitution – Section 14(3) Requires an amendment to give it teeth Call it a Catch-22 situation, you won’t be wrong And, yet, ubi jus ibi remedium This is why the Governors’ intervention Should be welcomed At the very least, it was but Freedom of expression at play All the more so, because The Governors also affirmed their faith – In the unity of Nigeria Having said all that, however, One cannot but agree with some (Notably, Mike Ozekhome, SAN) – Who have opined that the Governors’ specific call For a national dialogue Is somewhat unfounded Given our recent national experience – With such get-togethers – most recently That of Twenty Fourteen Its report – like that of others before it Sits atop the proverbial shelf – forgotten Finally, beyond the populism Of the anti-open grazing ban In terms of its legalism, An interesting dimension is thrown up by the Land Use Act This generation-old law (It was enacted in 1978) Provides in Section 46(1)(d) thereof That the National Council of States – May make Regulations for granting Temporary Certificates of Occupancy In respect of any land in Nigeria Thus, somewhat circumscribing the ban This is because, nothing stops Its opponents within the Council Namely, Northern Governors and the Federal Government From invoking this clause – And, prescribing, instead, an alternative In the form of temporary rights of occupancy To be availed to interested pastoralists Is this feasible? It remains to be seen
Written By Abubakar D. Sani, Esq.
19th May, 2021